Which two statements describe a zero trust network access (ZTNA) private access use case?

The statement regarding the security posture of the device being secure and support for all TCP-based applications accurately reflects an essential aspect of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). In a ZTNA environment, the security posture of endpoints (devices) is critical because ZTNA assumes that threats can originate from inside or outside the network; thus, each device must meet strict security criteria before being granted access to resources.

Additionally, supporting TCP-based applications is relevant, as ZTNA solutions are designed to work seamlessly with a variety of applications that operate over TCP, which is a fundamental protocol for many internet communications. With this compatibility, ZTNA can effectively extend secure access to users without compromising security or usability.

In contrast, the other statements do not properly align with the ZTNA principles. For instance, stating that all communications are encrypted while allowing access to all users contradicts the ZTNA model that emphasizes verifying identity and context before granting access, rather than presenting blanket access permissions. Similarly, asserting that only internal users have access undermines the ZTNA approach, which extends secure access based on identity and security posture, not just location. Lastly, the significance of trusted networks and manual approval of all access is contrary to the automated processes and adaptive